United States v. Hotaling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Sexually explicit images that -9- use the faces of actual minors are not protected expressive speech under the First Amendment.”
• “[I]t is settled law that child pornography is not protected expressive speech under the First Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).