Skip to main content
· 7/15/1980

United States v. Hossbach

Citations

  • 518 F. Supp. 759
  • 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendants’ argument that “subpoena power in criminal investigations rests exclusively in the hands of grand juries and courts” in light of § 876’s broad grant of subpoena power “in any investigation”
  • subpoena of telephone toll records within scope of power granted by § 876
  • requiring government to prove clear and convincing evidence of same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: VanARTSDALEN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.