Skip to main content
· 5/5/1930

United States v. Hoshor

Citations

  • 41 F.2d 1018
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence that property served as family home over which both parties shared control sufficient to show that property was commingled into joint asset
  • the wife was a homemaker and also participated equally in management of vineyard business
  • husband’s limited sharing of separately held investment account for payment of household expenses did not make the account a marital asset in absence of evidence that husband intended the account to become a marital asset
  • the husband’s limited sharing of a separately held investment account for payment of household expenses did not make the account a marital asset in the absence of evidence that the husband intended the account to become a marital asset

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.