· 5/5/1930
United States v. Hoshor
Citations
- 41 F.2d 1018
- 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 3043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence that property served as family home over which both parties shared control sufficient to show that property was commingled into joint asset
- the wife was a homemaker and also participated equally in management of vineyard business
- husband’s limited sharing of separately held investment account for payment of household expenses did not make the account a marital asset in absence of evidence that husband intended the account to become a marital asset
- the husband’s limited sharing of a separately held investment account for payment of household expenses did not make the account a marital asset in the absence of evidence that the husband intended the account to become a marital asset
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.