United States v. Horace Henry Mathews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties may stipulate to facts from which jurisdiction may be inferred
• asserting that guilty plea \establishes the factual basis for jurisdiction\
• “The effect of a guilty plea is well established: it is an admission of all the elements of a formal criminal charge and con- clusively admits all factual allegations of the indictment.” (internal quota- tion marks and citation omitted)
• “a guilty plea conclusively proves the fac- tual allegations contained in the indictment”
• “a guilty plea conclusively proves the 2 factual allegations contained in the indictment”
• “Matthews seeks to avoid his sentence 19 on the ground that an allegation in the indictment . . . is contradicted by the evidence. By 20 pleading guilty to the indictment, however, Matthews conclusively admitted the allegation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).