United States v. Horace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants who worked together “clearly shared a common interest in the subject matter of [one of the defendant’s] statements about [one of the plaintiffs]”
• holding that a supervisor’s statement that the plaintiffs’ protected activities “would create a ‘problem’ for plaintiffs” could reasonably be interpreted as some evidence of retaliatory animus
• dismissing procedural due process claim because, among other reasons, plaintiff failed to identify the “source” of his claimed property interest
• “Although, as pleaded, these allegations are based on hearsay, that does not bar the [c]ourt from considering them on a motion to dismiss.”
• “Although, as pleaded, these allegations are based on hearsay, that does not bar the [c]ourt from considering them on a motion to dismiss.”
• “a plaintiff need not plead specific, admissible evidence -6- in support of a claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).