United States v. Honorable June L. Green, United States District Court Judge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district judge was authorized to withdraw oral ruling granting defendant’s motion to dismiss indictment since such a ruling “is not immutable, and is of course subject to further reflection, reconsideration, and change.”
• “The oral ruling of a trial judge is not immutable, and is of course subject to further reflection, reconsideration and change.”
• “The oral ruling of a trial judge is not immutable, and is of course subject to further reflection, reconsideration and change”
• when trial judge withdrew oral ruling and entered a new order after hearing further argument, original ruling had “no legal significance” and was not subject to review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).