United States v. Holly Brock, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counseled defendant’s pro se motion to rescind order of pretrial detention triggered exclusion of time
• finding it unnecessary to allege an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy to import and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 963
• excluding period of time during which counsel’s motion to withdraw was pending
• Brock’s unsubstantiated allegation that his memory may have faded was insufficient to establish actual and substantial prejudice
• an unsupported assertion that the defendant’s “memory of events that occurred between 1975 and 1979 might have faded” does not establish actual and substantial prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).