United States v. Hollon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the balancing test does not pose any serious risk of undermining incentives for parties and lawyers to be careful about protecting privileged documents”
• “an intentional disclosure of opinion work-product to a testifying expert effectively waives the work-product privilege”
• discussing the inadvertent disclosure of a privileged communication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).