United States v. Holger-Helmut Brummer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a First Amendment retaliation case, that \[t]he policy concerns underlying Harlow [v. Fitzgerald
• \for further consideration in light of Kremer v. Chemical Constr. Corp.
• stating that the portion of Arkansas v. Sanders following Chadwick was \not affected” by the decision in United States v. Ross
• \In Pullman-Standard v. Swint
• \In Pullman-Standard v. Swint
• “[T]he voluntary use of certain [district] court procedures’ 19 ||serve[s] as ‘constructive consent to the personal juris- diction of the [district] courtTTTT’ \ (alteration in original) (quoting Ins. Corp. of Ire- land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).