United States v. Hoeninghaus & Curtiss
Citations
- 137 F. 478
- 69 C.C.A. 626
- 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4565
Syllabus
<p>Customs Duties—Ascertainment op Component Material of Chief Value—Warping—Process of Weaving.</p> <p>Under section 7, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, 30 Stat. 205 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1093'J, providing that the component material of chief value in imported merchandise “shall be determined by the ascertained value of such material, in its condition as found in the article,” held that, as to woven fabrics, the ascertainment should be made with reference to the time, the process of weaving commences; that the operation of warping is not a part of such process; and that the cost of such operation should be included wholly in the value of the material constituting the warp of the fabrics, and not distributed between the warp and the weft.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the “practicalities of life” (such 22 as an attorney’s “conflicting professional engagements” or personal commitments such as 23 vacations, family activities, illnesses, or death) often necessitate an enlargement of time to comply 24 with a court deadline
- explaining that the “practicalities of life” (such as an 22 attorney’s “conflicting professional engagements” or personal commitments such as vacations, 23 family activities, illnesses, or death) often necessitate an enlargement of time to comply with a court 24 deadline
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.