United States v. Hode

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the absence of such notice in the purpose statement of the instruction meant that no portion 15 ACM 38396 of the instruction was punitive
• concluding the absence of such notice in the purpose statement of the instruction meant that no portion of the instruction was punitive
• finding Air Force Alcoholic Beverage Program was not punitive but did create the basis for a military duty enforceable via Article 92(3), UCMJ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Leblanc
  Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 2015-03-26· cited 99×
• United States v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1998-09-30· cited 60×
• United States v. Shavrnoch
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1998-09-30· cited 27×
• United States v. Bivins
  Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1996-12-16· cited 7×
• United States v. Green
  Army Court of Criminal Appeals· 2003-06-06· cited 6×
• United States v. Shavrnoch
  Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1997-06-27· cited 3×
• United States v. Jackson
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2005-08-31· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Sales
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-08-18· cited 1,442×
• United States v. Suzuki
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1985-07-29· cited 105×
• United States v. Nardell
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1972-04-21· cited 29×
• United States v. Louder
  U S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1979-03-19· cited 10×
• United States v. Sweitzer
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1963-05-10· cited 9×