Skip to main content
· 11/25/1861

United States v. Hignera

Citations

  • 26 F. Cas. 310
  • 1861 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Court holds broader discretion when considering a motion for new trial than when considering a motion for judgment of acquittal
  • finding inadmissible evidence of an attempt to pay restitution to a private party in order to compromise a claim of embezzlement and larceny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.