Skip to main content
· 8/27/1993

United States v. High Country Broadcasting Company, Inc.

Citations

  • 3 F.3d 1244
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 11029
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6397
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 835
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that entry of default judgment was 20 appropriate where corporate defendant failed to comply with order to retain counsel
  • holding that 14 a corporation’s president and sole shareholder could not make “an end run” around the counsel 15 16 requirement by intervening pro se rather than retaining counsel to represent the corporation
  • holding that 7 8 a corporation’s president and sole shareholder could not make “an end run” around the counsel 9 requirement by intervening pro se rather than retaining counsel to represent the corporation
  • affirming a default judgment against a 23 corporate defendant that failed to comply with the court’s order requiring it to retain new 24 counsel
  • affirming district court’s entry of default judgment against a corporation when 14 the corporation failed to retain counsel
  • affirming a default judgment against a corporate defendant that failed 9 ||to comply with the court’s order requiring it to retain new counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.