United States v. Hien Hai Hoac, United States of America v. Hgai Choy Chan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \a codefendant's statement that does not incriminate the defendant unless linked with other evidence introduced at trial does not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights\
• noting that \a co-defendant's statement that does not incriminate the defendant unless linked with other evidence introduced at trial does not violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights\
• exclusion of testimony by expert on Chinese culture not abuse of discretion where expert's knowl- edge of defendant was limited and testimony would not have helped the jury
• consistency between the physical evidence and a defendant’s confession minimizes any prejudice from omitting a § 3501(a) instruction
• ’a codefendant’s statement that does not incriminate the defendant unless linked with other evidence introduced at trial does not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights’
• defendant owned trading company and leased warehouse to which drugs were delivered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).