United States v. Herrera-Arteaga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the FDCPA “prohibits the use of ... abusive measures ..., and bans the use of false, deceptive, ... unfair, or unconscionable means of collecting a debt”
• “A motion to reconsider is not a vehicle for rehashing arguments the Court has already rejected or for attempting to refute the basis for the Court’s earlier decision.”
• “A motion to reconsider is not a vehicle for rehashing arguments the Court has already rejected or for attempting to refute the basis for the Court’s earlier decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).