United States v. Hermilo Zamudio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that attorneys are “not 18 require[d] . . . to make arguments based on cases that have not yet been decided”
• explaining that the statute of limitations for an illegal reentry crime begins to run when the defendant is “found in” the United States
• “Strickland does not require attorneys to make arguments based on cases that have not yet been decided.”
• “Strickland does not require attorneys to make arguments based on 20 cases that have not yet been decided.”
• “The standard for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel under the Fifth Amendment in immigration cases is higher than the Sixth Amendment standard . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).