United States v. Herman Hicks, Radar Tyler, and Driefus Harbin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the standard of review for insufficiency claim is “daunting”
• describing the standard of review facing the defendants on sufficiency of the evidence argument as “a daunting one”
• affirming based on “quantity of drugs,” transaction fre- quency, standardized transactions, paying of “consult” fee, and “fronting,” and discussing factors
• affirming based on “quantity of drugs,” transaction fre- quency, standardized transactions, paying of “consult” fee, and “fronting,” and discussing factors
• affirming based on “quantity of drugs,” transaction fre- quency, standardized transactions, paying of “consult” fee, and “fronting,” and discussing factors
• explaining that “‘fronting’” can be evidence of a conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).