United States v. Herbert L. Foutz, United States of America v. Ralph F. Esposito, Jr., A/K/A Rapid, United States of America v. Frank Armentani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a sentencer “may not, of course, consider information which is simply inaccurate, or which improperly implicates a defendant’s constitutional rights”
• district court's findings on controverted factual matters contained in presentence report reviewable for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).