United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “unlikely future civil confinement” of the defendant does not “make unimportant the Government’s interest in prosecuting [the defendant] on the serious charges against him”
• finding government report inadequate to prove that proposed treatment plan was “substantially likely” to restore defendant’s competency where it stated only that “such medication is the ‘primary’ way to treat Schizophrenia” and “nowhere addressed” defendant’s individual concerns
• “We think it beyond dispute that the Government does have an important interest in trying a defendant charged with a felony carrying a maximum punishment of 10' years imprisonment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).