United States v. Henry W. Schauble II

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the defendant had not made a substantial showing of the affiant’s untruthfulness, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for in camera disclosure of informant whose tip was basis for search warrant
• “Schauble offered in evidence an affidavit filled out by a [different police officer] to search a different residence. That affidavit is almost identical in terminology to the ... affidavit [being challenged].... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).