United States v. Henry Ubiera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing claim for plain error where defendant objected but ʺraise[d] a substantially different argument on appealʺ
• “Booker does require 22 factfinding by a jury and beyond a reasonable doubt, but only where the fact ‘is necessary to 15 1 support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of 2 guilty.’” (quoting Booker, 543 U.S. at 244)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).