United States v. Henry M. Collier, Jr., M. D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting vagueness challenge to a federal analog, where the phrase “course of professional practice” was “[m]anifestly . . . intended to limit . . . immunity” and did not aid “doctors [who] become drug ‘pushers’”
• “It is apparent that a licensed practitioner is not immune from the act solely due to his status, . . . but rather, because he is expected to prescribe or dispense drugs within the bounds of his professional practice of medicine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).