United States v. Henry Louis Ismond and Winston Daniel Fraser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for resentencing because the district court failed to make individualized findings and because the trial evidence did not support the quantity of drugs attributed to each appellant
• remanding for resentencing because the district court failed to make individualized findings and because the trial evidence did not support the quantity of drugs attributed to each appellant
• “For sentencing purposes a member of a drug conspiracy is liable for his own acts and the acts of others in furtherance of the activity that the defendant agreed to undertake and that are reasonably foreseeable in connection with that activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).