United States v. Henry Garcia, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the expulsion of defense counsel in the presence of the jury cannot be condoned, but finding that the temporary removal in that case did not influence “in any materially adverse way the jury’s perception of the defendant”
• noting that the expulsion of defense counsel in the presence of the jury cannot be condoned, but finding that the temporary removal in that case did not influence \in any materially adverse way the jury's perception of the defendant\
• inquiry adequate when district court held hearing and considered written declarations from the defendant and his attorney
• “The record reflects that [defense counsel] defended [the defendant] fully and forcefully.”
• \We have consistently held that a district court has broad discretion to deny a motion for substitution made on the eve of trial if the substitution would require a continuance.\ (citing United States v. McClendon, 782 F.2d 785, 789 (9th Cir. 1986))
• “We have consistently held that a district court has broad discretion to deny a motion for substitution made on the eve of trial if the substitution would require a continuance.” (citing United States v. McClendon, 782 F.2d 785, 789 (9th Cir. 1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).