United States v. Henry Drew & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “tallying results” of early voting did not occur until Election Day
• finding early voting was not preempted by Federal Election Day Statutes, and that under Foster, “so long as a State does not conclude an election prior to federal election day, the State’s law will not ‘actually conflict’ with federal law”
• “[T]he plaintiffs’ argument would apply with equal force to absentee voting and result in a declaration that federal law preempts a widely accepted and long-standing electoral 16 practice,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).