· 9/17/1984
United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
Citations
- 743 F.2d 439
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18565
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming exclusion of evidence regarding civil proceeding between defendant and Postal Service because of potential for jury confusion
- good-faith belief in enterprise does not excuse false or reckless representations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Martin, Swygert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.