United States v. Henry Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “all of the extant appellate precedent is on the side of applying Davis” to pre-Jones GPS tracking
• doubting deterrent effect of prohibiting police from relying on out-of-circuit authority “just because the circuit . . . lacks its own precedent”
• questioning whether there is any deterrence to be gained by telling police they may not “rely on decisions issued by several circuits, just because the circuit covering the state in which an investigation is ongoing lacks its own precedent”
• questioning whether there is any deterrence to be gained by telling police they may not “rely on decisions issued by several circuits, just because the circuit covering the state in which an investigation is ongoing lacks its own precedent”
• Knotts and Karo are binding appellate precedent for purposes of consensual GPS installation and subsequent surveillance
• Knotts and Karo are binding appellate precedent for purposes of consensual GPS installation and subsequent surveillance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).