· 5/1/1997
United States v. Henry Achiekwelu
Citations
- 112 F.3d 747
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9393
- 1997 WL 214806
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that this court will find an abuse of - 4 - discretion only if the district court’s evidentiary ruling was arbitrary or irrational
- “Even when a district court admits evidence without objection, the district court has the discretion to grant a subsequent motion made after the close of the evidence to exclude the evidence.”
- “Even when a district court admits evidence without objection, the district court has the discretion to grant a subse- quent motion made after the close of the evidence to exclude the evidence.”
- “Even when a district court admits evidence without objection, the district court has the discretion to grant a subse- quent motion made after the close of the evidence to exclude the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murnaghan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.