Skip to main content
· 7/18/1946

United States v. Henke Const. Co.

Citations

  • 157 F.2d 13
  • 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Klaxon rule where the action was “brought under a federal statute,” but “in the nature of an action on contract and the construction of the federal statute [wa]s not involved”
  • “[w]hile the present action is brought under a federal statute [the Miller Act], it is in the nature of an action on contract and the construction of the federal statute is not involved . . . the doctrine of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 (1938

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanborn, Woodrough, Riddick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.