United States v. Hector Ramirez-Jiminez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that while the trial court failed to make an explicit finding under Rule 403, the court implicitly made the necessary finding because the government’s trial memorandum reminded the judge of the necessity of weighing probative value and prejudice
• explaining evidence that defendant had lied to government agents when stopped during crime was “probative of his consciousness that his conduct was illegal” and therefore Rule 404(b) was inapplicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).