United States v. Hector Aceves-Rosales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that disclosure of evidence by defendant after the government rested its case in chief supported the district court’s decision to exclude that evidence
• finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding defendant’s proposed medical record exhibit when defense counsel had acquired the record a day before trial and waited until after the prosecution rested to disclose its existence
• “It is indisputable that an automobile can inflict deadly force on a person and that it can be used as a deadly weapon.”
• “It is indisputable that an automobile can inflict deadly force on a person and that it can be used as a deadly weapon.”
• “It is indisputable that an automobile can inflict deadly force on a person and that it can be used as a deadly weapon.”
• An automobile “can be used as a deadly weapon” and “inflict deadly force on a person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).