Skip to main content
· 11/12/1998

United States v. Heatley

Citations

  • 39 F. Supp. 2d 287
  • 1999 WL 61816
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that a generic integration clause in a proffer agreement would not preclude consideration of additional oral promises made by the Government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.