United States v. Hayes, Maurice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the improper preclusion of defense evidence was harmless error when the defendant gave an implausible explanation for the number of overtime hours he submitted, and numerous mobile phone records and other evidence called his credibility into question
• reasoning that because imperative statements were not assertive, they did not “express a ‘truth’ for which they could be offered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).