Skip to main content
· 1/12/2017

United States v. Hausa

Citations

  • 232 F. Supp. 3d 257
  • 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66587
  • 2017 WL 1372660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for a Rule 104 hearing regarding admissibility of defendant's purported adoptive admission and ordering a new trial if the State failed to meet its burden on admissibility
  • remanding for the trial court to conduct a Rule 104 hearing to determine if the State had met its burden to establish whether a hearsay document was admissible as an adoptive admission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.