Skip to main content
· 4/15/1996

United States v. Hatney

Citations

  • 80 F.3d 458
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7733
  • 1996 WL 143406

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e may affirm a district court’s enhancement even absent particularized findings regarding the defendant’s perjury so long as the district court found in general that the defendant’s testimony was perjurious as to material matters and the record supports that finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Carnes, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.