· 4/15/1996
United States v. Hatney
Citations
- 80 F.3d 458
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7733
- 1996 WL 143406
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e may affirm a district court’s enhancement even absent particularized findings regarding the defendant’s perjury so long as the district court found in general that the defendant’s testimony was perjurious as to material matters and the record supports that finding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kravitch, Carnes, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.