Skip to main content
· 6/21/1967

United States v. Haskel Engineering & Supply Company

Citations

  • 380 F.2d 786
  • 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5077
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An expenditure may be, by its nature, ordinary and necessary, but at the same time it may be unreasonable in amount. In such a case only the portion which was reasonable would qualify for a deduction under § 162(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Hamley, Duniway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.