Skip to main content
· 2/3/1913

United States v. Harvey Steel Co.

Citations

  • 227 U.S. 165
  • 33 S. Ct. 258
  • 57 L. Ed. 464
  • 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2286

Syllabus

<p>The construction given to a contract by this court is either authoritatively controlling or conclusively persuasive in a subsequent suit between the same parties; and so held that the contentions relied on in. this case as to the contract heretofore construed in United States v. Harvey Steel Co., 196 U. S. 310, are, in the light of that decision, so frivolous that the judgment of the Court of Claims following it should be affirmed without further argument.</p> <p>United States v. Harvey Steel Co., 196 U. S. 310, followed to effect that the Government is liable for royalties on the Harvey process even though every element thereof was not used on the plates involved in this action, and even though the contractor furnishing the plates and who used the process by permission of the United States was not specifically required to use it.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.