Skip to main content
· 6/1/1905

United States v. Hartley & Graham

Citations

  • 140 F. 969
  • 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4867

Syllabus

<p>Customs Duties — Protest—Sufficiency—Specification of Wrong Invoice.</p> <p>Certain imported merchandise, covered by an entry embracing three invoices, was all subjected to the same rate of duty, which, it appeared, was excessive as to one of the invoices. In protesting against the rate of duty the importer specified one of the two invoices on which duty was correctly assessed. Held, that the protest should be considered restricted to the invoice which it specified.</p>

Judges: Townsend

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.