United States v. Harry Stephens, Jr. And Claude Lee Hooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s stipulation to admission of evidence waived defendant’s constitutional right to confront the source of the evidence
• “Because this is a direct appeal, the issue is not properly before this court”
• defense counsel may waive defendant's sixth amendment right to confrontation by stipulating to the admission of evidence as long as defendant does not dissent from his attorney's decision was a legitimate trial tactic or part of a prudent trial strategy
• stipulation read in open court with the defendant present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).