United States v. Harry Packer, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda was harmless error given overwhelming evidence of guilt, including constitutionally-obtained subsequent statements and physical evidence
• ruling that newly discovered evidence must be material to support a new trial
• “The admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda may constitute harmless error when there remains overwhelming independent evidence as to the defendant’s guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).