United States v. Harry N. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• section 922(g)(1) was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to possession of a firearm that had travelled in interstate commerce
• instruction that \it is sufficient that the firearm allegedly possessed or received by defendant had at some point previously travelled across a state line\ upheld in Section 922(g)(1) case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).