United States v. Harry Hargrove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[a] sentencing error is harmless if the resulting sentence was not longer than that to which the defendant would otherwise be subject” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that “[a] sentencing error is harmless if the resulting sentence was not longer than that to which the defendant would otherwise be subject” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that “[a] sentencing error is harmless if the resulting sentence was not longer than that to which the defendant would otherwise be subject” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing that procedural errors during sentencing, such as improperly calculating a Guidelines range, are subject to harmless-error review
• observing that procedural errors during sentencing, such as improperly calculating a Guidelines range, are subject to harmless- error review
• affirming 60-month upward variant sentence imposed on defendant whose assumed Guidelines range was 0-6 5 months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).