United States v. Harry C. Kaufmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient evidence on “representation” element where car buyer stated he was a drug dealer, and that he wanted to buy the car with cash, using a false name
• finding sufficient evidence on “representation” element where car buyer stated he was a drug dealer, and that he wanted to buy the car with cash, using a false name
• stating “several circuits have, without addressing the question of appellate jurisdiction, entertained an appeal on one count of a criminal indictment while other counts of the indictment were unresolved” and collecting cases
• “[S]everal circuits have . . . entertained an appeal on one count of a criminal indictment while other counts of the indictment were unresolved.”
• \Whether a defendant has the ability to effectively cross-examine a witness turns on whether the jury has sufficient information to make a discriminating appraisal of a witness's motive and bias.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).