United States v. Harry B. Helmsley, Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Harry B. Helmsley and Leona M. Helmsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pre-discovery amendment would 13 prejudice defendant “through the time and expense of continued litigation on a new theory, 14 with the possibility of additional discovery”
• denying a request for a hearing but approving the referral of grand jury leaks for prosecution
• denying a request for a hearing but approving the referral of grand jury leaks for prosecution
• addressing the merits of the writ after a request was first made in a reply brief to treat the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus “if th[e] court determined that an interlocutory appeal was unwarranted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).