United States v. Harold Wasserman, Car-Mar Enterprises, Inc., and Abraham Linet, D/B/A Ultima Sales Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “no basis for prohibiting prosecutions which violate internal Department of Justice policy memoranda” and rejecting the contention that the government prosecuted the defendants “in contravention of a Department of Justice policy memorandum”
• retroactive application of Miller is inappropriate without substantial justification outweighing ex post facto considerations
• retroactive application of Miller is inappropriate without substantial justification outweighing ex post facto considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).