United States v. Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Pacific and Southern Company, Inc. D/B/A Wxia-Tv, Movant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Title III creates no independent bar to the public’s right of access to . . . wiretap materials legally intercepted and admitted into evidence pursuant to the statute”
• holding that “Title III creates no independent bar to the public’s right of access to . . . wiretap materials legally intercepted and admitted into evidence pursuant to the statute”
• stating that trial court may consider whether contemporaneous access will be administratively difficult and disrupt progress of trial
• “[A]ny decision of another circuit, published or unpublished, is only of persuasive value.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).