United States v. Harold B. Kail

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[floundation ... may also be established by circumstantial evidence, or by a combination of direct and circumstantial evidence.”
• warrant to seize almost all business records justified because there was probable cause to believe fraud permeated entire business operation
• “[T]he evidence demonstrates that Kail’s representations with regard to the market value of the coins were false, and that these representations were made with an intent to defraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).