United States v. Haro-Torres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that withdrawing the appellant’s pass privileges, where that privilege was provided as a matter of course and was only withdrawn where an individual was charged with misconduct, had “the same substantive effect of restricting the appellant”
• describing circumstances under which certain forms of restriction may trigger the protections of Article 10

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).