United States v. Harlen Manuel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court's erroneous jury instruction was harmless because uncontradicted evidence supported the conviction
• holding that subsection (c) does not impose a six-hour maximum from arrest to arraignment when a confession can be obtained and instead requires a finding of involuntariness
• noting that the Fourth Amendment does not directly apply to Indian tribes
• considering suppression of evidence based on argument that arrest by tribal officers violated ICRA
• considering suppression of evidence based on argument that arrest by tribal officers violated ICRA
• allowing an extremely intoxicated man to sleep and have a meal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).