United States v. Harlan Peacock and Harold Peacock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that referral of matters to magistrates under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) “does not offend the Constitution so long as de novo review is available in the district court”
• holding that referral of matters to magistrates under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) “does not offend the Constitution so long as de novo review is available in the district court”
• magistrate need only conclude that it would be reasonable to seek evidence at the place to be searched
• magistrate need only conclude that it would be reasonable to seek evidence at the place to be searched
• two conspiracy counts multiplicitous where parties, time period, location and overt acts alleged in each conspiracy count were identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).